Posts mit dem Label Marquartstein werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen
Posts mit dem Label Marquartstein werden angezeigt. Alle Posts anzeigen

27. Februar 2015

Das Mädchen mit den Orangenpapieren

Ein kleines Buch, eine Kurzgeschichte von Hanns Zischler, dem mit den zwei nn im Hanns, bekannt als Schauspieler: »Das Mädchen mit den Orangenpapieren«.

Erst dachte ich: »orange Papiere«, dachte an die Farbe, wie sie Post-Its gerne haben. Gefehlt: Es geht um dünne Einwickelpapiere von Orangen, »Apfelsinen«, wie der Norddeutsche sagt. Man wickelte die Früchte aus und strich die zarten Hüllen vorsichtig glatt, früher, im Vor-grünen-Punkt-Zeitalter.
   Ich hoffe, der Urheber verzeiht mir das Muster links, hier die Quelle mit weiteren schönen Motiven, und hier zu einen 84-jährigen Sammler mit dreitausend so Papierln.
   Hanns Zischler zeigt auf seinem Buch »Das Mädchen mit den Orangenpapieren« (112 Seiten, € 16,99, ISBN: 978-3869710969, Galiani Berlin September 2014) eine Orangen-»Zentaurin«, eher eine »Pegaseuse«, fröhlich fliegend mit Flöte, beflügelt von Orangen selbst nur »seconda« qualità:
So schaut’s aus, Elsas Orangenpapier, »Anello & la Mantia, Palermo, seconda«:
»Ein wildes Mischwesen, halb Männlein, halb Pegasus mit schwarz geschecktem Pferdeleib, entblößten Brüsten und stürmisch wehendem Haar springt und fliegt es mit schmetternder Fanfare durch einen roten Kreis.« (p 90)
Von einer feenhaften »Externen«, der Elsa aus Dresden (Zone), wird erzählt, einer Schülerin des Landschulheims Marquartstein wie Hanns Zischler – und ich. Die Internen (nur Buben) und die Externen (auch Mädchen) waren immer in getrennten Klassen, was das Verständnis nicht gefördert hat.
   Zischlers zwanzig Erinnerungskapitel blieben mir wenig konkret, aber das soll so sein, das ist ihr Reiz. Es geht um Andeutungen, eben Erinnerungen, fleckerlhaft. So rühmt etwa Roman Halfmann in seiner Kritik für den Hessischen Rundfunk »wie verschwiegen der Autor eine innere Entwicklung nachzuzeichnen in der Lage ist, die wortlos und jeder Sprache entzogen stattfindet.«
Beliebt: Mohr (moro)
   Als notorischer Besserwisser und wenige Jahre älterer Internatsschüler – auf die Kleinen haben wir gern heruntergeschaut, ebenso wie auf die Externen – bin ich mehr am Kritteln an dieser Geschichte, so sehr mich einzelne Episoden und Teilthemen, etwa der Technikrausch im »Popular Mechanics« oder die Ballonfahrt über den Chiemsee, Spass machen. Wie Improvisationen am Klavier. Manchem mag man nachgehen, wie dem Steig am Nazipeter (p 20, 58), oder nachgoogeln, dem Halleyschen Kometen vielleicht (p 21, 19. Mai 1910), anderes stehen lassen wie die schöne Circumetnea (p 34). Hochgelobt wird Zischlers Sprache, und die ist auch schön und unpretentiös. Wie beim Fernsehen halt. Kurze Sätze. Kurze Absätze. Brimboriumfrei.
   Trotzdem: Darf ich kritisieren, was mir auffiel? Bin so frei.
   Da ist zunächst eine unnötig verwirrende Mischung von Klarnamen und Phantasienamen, Marquartstein heißt Marstein (wir nannten’s nur M’stein), die Berge sind teils verfremdet, teils deutlich da, Lehrer mal so, mal so, bis zu Falschschreibungen wie Zmogrovitch (p 75) für Smogrovics, Gott hab’ ihn selig. Warum das? Gut, wer nicht dabei war, den stört’s vielleicht nicht. Ich müsste mal eine Tabelle machen, nichtöffentlich.
   Dann das unbayrische Idiom. Das sind dann Kleinigkeiten, die schief liegen. Eine Steinschleuder hieß bei uns nie »Zwille« (p 53). »Schau mal« (p 19), hätt keiner gesagt, möchte ich behaupten, und »Pfoten weg!« (p 61) auch nicht, ein Zugereister vielleicht, »Finger weg!« tät da passen. »Tüten Sie mir das alles schön ein, Frau Gaukler, ich lass es später agholen, habedieehre« (p 9) – Was stimmt da eher nicht? Richtig: die Tüte. Dann die »DDR«, aus der Elsa kommen soll. Die gab’s, wir hatten sie aber damals noch nicht, nicht einmal in Anführungszeichen: Das war für uns nur die »Zone«. Zischler ist Preuße, würde ich diagnostizieren, dazu muss man aber wissen, was in Bayern ein Preuße war und ist, entsprechend knapp ausgesprochen.
   Einen alkoholkranken Schuldirektor hatten wir wirklich, da ist’s gut, dass sein Name geändert wurde, und etwas jähzorning war er in der Tat – von ihm hab’ ich im Speisesaal der Burg mit vielleicht dreizehn meine letzte ordentliche Watsche bekommen. Der Mann war aber ein Genie, hat die Schule weitergebracht wie kein anderer. Wir hatten ihn in Deutsch und Philosophie, begnadet! Ihn auf seine »Fahne« zu reduzieren, wird ihm nicht gerecht (p 37).
   Selbst der rührende kriegsversehrte Hausierer (p 66) kommt mir aus einer anderen Zeit vor, aus einer etwas früheren, gleich nach dem Krieg. Schön erzählt ist’s trotzdem.
   Überhaupt finde ich, die Sprache schwankt zwischen sehr, sehr schön und kippt gelegentlich zum Kitsch.»Der wasserkopfige Schatten des Ballons gleitet über die Ache und treidelt seine flüchtige Spur über das Schilf längs des Flusses«, sieht mir schön aus (p 85), obwohl vielleicht »wassertröpfig« gemeint war. Aber: »Die winzigen, von Schnee schon überzuckerten Johannisbeeren der Rücklichter tröpfeln ihre Spur auf die Schneedecke, ehe der VW aufheulend in der Nacht verschwindet« (p 109), ist mir doch etwas zu expressionistisch, Kitsch.
   Die »Liebesszene«, p 91. Vielleicht ist das wirklich so passiert, dann bitte ich um Entschuldigung. Zart beschrieben ist es ja, aber ganz so schwuppdiwupp lief sowas damals nicht, »fast schmerzlos vereinigen sie sich«, wo’s noch keine Pille und dafür viel katholische Sexualmoral gab. Die Szene hätt’s nicht gebraucht.
   Insgesamt ein nettes Buch, schöne Erinnerungen, bissl sehr teuer – und in wenigen Stunden gelesen, außer man kommt ins Träumen (und Bloggen).



  Das Kapitel »Der ertrunkene See« (p 30): http://youtu.be/B0fcVjw7muY

Aus einem it. Ebay-Angebot
Als E-Buch € 14,99. Leseprobe.

Weitere Links:
 
Orangenpapier von Seite 41, Lyrafrau, Guttadauro, Palermo.

Romano Gardanis Sammlung von »über 22.400 ›incarti‹«, italienisch
Begrenzte Sammlung von »incarti frutta«, »veline«, italienisch.
Incarti‹ auf Facebook, Nandos Sammlung, Geschichte (it.),

Buchkritik NDR: http://www.ndr.de/kultur/buch/tipps/Hanns-Zischler-Das-Maedchen-mit-den-Orangenpapieren,orangenpapieren102.html

»Hanns Zischlers Erzählung ist ein literarisches Kleinod von enormer erzählerischer Kraft.«
http://www.kiwi-verlag.de/buch/das-maedchen-mit-den-orangenpapieren/978-3-86971-096-9/

SWR: http://www.swr.de/swr2/programm/sendungen/buchkritik/hanns-zischler-das-maedchen-mit-den-orangenpapieren/-/id=658730/did=14483544/nid=658730/cvt6h6/index.html

WDR: http://www.wdr3.de/literatur/dasmaedchenmitdenorangenpapieren100.pdf


»Fred the Frog« (p 38): http://www.Joern.De/tipsn122.htm
Briefmarke zum Tod Stalins, 1953 (Wikipedia).
Ich erinnere mich noch, dass wir in der Aula
des Schlosses extra einen »Morgenapell« hatten.

Meine M’stein-Zusammenstellung: http://www.Joern.De/MStein.htm

Der Weg vom Schloss (Schule) zur Burg (Mahlzeiten, Wohnen) vorbei am Nazi-Peter und über den Prügelweg (p 60, Zischler nennt ihn »Knüppelweg«), heute Burgstraße, den Elsa bevorzugte p 58): Bilder ab https://picasaweb.google.com/Fritz.Joern/50JahreAbi#5628366367954541218

Erinnerungen an ein Ehemaligentreffen 2008: http://blogabissl.blogspot.de/2008_06_01_archive.html#Mstein2008



Link hierher: http://blogabissl.blogspot.com/2015/02/das-madchen-mit-den-orangenpapieren.html

11. November 2012




Bradfield College
Remincences

Benedictus es o Domine,
doce me statuta tua
I was seventeen in 1959, when I came to Bradfield College – today something else, of course – for a short Winter Term. In Germany I had been a longtime boarding school inhabitant, having come to Landschulheim Marquartstein in Upper Bavaria at the age of ten in 1952. My good conduct and perhaps my good English let me get selected, together with my friend Uwe, equally an old resident there – pardon my rusty, Germanoid English please – for the first exchange between these newly partnering boarding schools.
   As normal in those days I travelled by train and ferry to England, changed in London – I think I even had to take the tube from Victoria Street Station to another station (Waterloo or Paddington?) – and ended up in Reading. From there on I was in the caring hands of Bradfield.
   Did my friend Uwe and I live in different “houses”? I remember A-House, up on a hill, I think Uwe was there. Gallantly I used to help a young mother to push her baby’s perambulator up the hill, in one of these big wheelers, only to be made fun of by the rest of the boys. I lived in the main U-shaped building in the valley.
   Episodes like this are most of my memories of Bradfield, today, over fifty years ago. Nevertheless, allow me to tell you.
   Each Wednesday afternoon there was the “Assault Course”, an event in full military uniform, with First World War rifles and in heavy black army boots. You even got trained to creep through an imagined mine field, quite naively though: the trick was to set your knees where your hands already had been (unless in heaven …).
   Then everybody had to cross a small, dirty river nearby, in two ways. One way was sliding down from an adjacent high tree – you practically had to step into the void: a test of courage, taking sometimes minutes of hesitation. Racing down you had your wrists in a looped rope passing through an angular piece of water pipe over the main rope, much safer than a parachute jump. The other way, secondly, the return, went via a horizontal rope across the river. You had to keep lying on top of the rope and pull yourself across, one booted leg stretched vertically down as a counterweight to you and your gear. Just when one “soldier” was in the middle, the next one mounted the rope, brought it to shiver ans shake, and made the man in the middle anxious and by reflex pull his perpendicular leg towards his body. Almost always he turned over into hanging under the rope. This position could be held only for a minute or so, and you had to decide which way to save yourself, going back or forward – like a donkey between haystacks. Invariantly you fell into the water – cold and dirty, with a complimental laugh by the rest of us.
Uniform trousers not in order.
The man stands at ease.
   We Germans were not allowed in arms, and so we remained pure spectators. My only active role there was to straighten the bottom of the trousers of the last one in a row of uniformed boys standing at attention. You couldn’t do that yourself without bending down, which messed up the straight trouser bottom.
   Another episode, with Beethoven’s »Albumblatt für Elise«. I virtually fell in love with the unknown (and unseen) piano student in the next house, near the school, or was it in a room of the school with an open window? Romantically I imagined a fine girl excercising. The circumstances were profane however: I had been used to go to the toilet privately: our school toilets were indoors and had doors to lock. The toilets in Bradfield College were outdoors, i. e. rather cold at this time of year, and they had no doors at all. For my “sessions” I choose free hours in the morning, to hopefully use the compartment by myself alone. Simultaneously someone else must have excercised the piano. In fact everywhere everything was done to prevent us from engaging in solo or, horribile dictu, joint sexual activities.
   You were not allowed in your bedroom during daytime, and the bedroom window had to be kept open at times, day and night. This bedroom – I was privileged to have one for myself alone – was so small that you had to hang clothes along the wall. A table with a cupboard underneath, a chair, a bed, that was all in this cell. I felt fine. But I closed my window when going down for breakfast. This anomaly could be seen from the courtyard. I was gently advised to leave my window open.
   Our “study” was warmer, in the centre of the building, no windows. Cozy, and full of books. We even had a record changer, playing Carmen Cavallaro and other smooth stuff like Bing Crosby or Sinatra all the time. In the study we were in three. Our group had a “living room” (house room) as well, for those without a study. Private space was extremely restricted, restricted to a small hanging cupboard for each. I remember one boy stacking his possessions so diligently into this cupboard that he kept his shoe polish tins fastened to the top board by thumb tacks.
   We had to run every afternoon, outsides, through the countryside. Today you’d call it jogging, but I remember it fiercer, more competitive, and exhausting. I’m not very sportive; newer was, to my regret. Had I stayed longer at Bradfield I would positively have learnt to enjoy it. Afterwards we had a good shower. But there were no showers, just small square basins to fold your body in. With a bit of contortionism a child could get all its body wet and warm in one dip. Wonderful.
   Boxing I liked as well. It turned out not to be “brutal” at all, just fast and fun. The slightest dizziness or staggering was taken as knock-out, the match was finished. We trained a one-two-three sequence of hitting with the left, then ducking, then hitting with the right – if I well remember. In general athletics everybody was astonished to see our red shorts, very short, with white T-shirt and school emblem; Englishmen  wore subdued colours and shorts long to their knees – like today.
   One evening a week our group prayed and sung hymns in the house room. The hyms, psalms, changed, the melodies as well. One evening our master apologized to me that one melody had been the German national anthem, and that he had noticed too late. I hadn’t even noticed; we were not very national in the fifties. In England the national anthem was played after the last cinema show each day, and you had to hear it correctly standing up.
   The right way to stand was another matter. We had to stand when the teachers entered the large, historic dining hall and walked en group to their elevated table. I was sitting at a table one gangway off the main corridor, and when my master came to his seat at our table I had first to turn to the main gangway, then around to ours, when he passed here. Even today I turn around en face when our priest circles the few faithful on Sundays.
   Secrecy. I gratefully remember a small boy who had developed a – completely harmless – liking or just an interest for me, but did not dare to show it openly. After a while he felt quite safe and happy in our study, but on his way to and from he rushed through the corridor not to be seen.
   Dress code. Bradfield’s code for priviledges, according to rank and age, was new to us. It seemd (and seems) very strange to grown-ups, but to us it was like mysterious, secret rules, building our community. Individual rules were without any sense. This did not matter, on the contrary, it added to the “code” character. We all played the game to use priviledges to the most, or even to try to sneak out of them for a while. Examples. Normal, colourful shirts came with detachable collar and cuffs. This allowed using white collars and cuffs, according to the rule, but nevertheless with individual, coloured shirts. (With socks you could not do that: for the smaller boys they were required in one colour.) Some of the less wealthy used washable rubber collars, a thing I knew only from jokes, and protective sleeves.
   We had distinctive dark blue college ties. I still must have mine somewhere (after reordering it once some thirty years ago …. Incidentally: I found todays dress code and other standards, 99 pages!). Blue Jeans were not a subject these days. Back in the boarding school at home we all had some Levis, shrinked (shrunk?) to fit on the very wearer’s body while drying. At Marquartstein we were not allowed to use these »Niethosen« (“riveted trousers”) outside of school premises.
   At Bradfield we all wore black gowns, the teachers long ones. Ours were short and wide. The sides to polish shoes and the side to wipe cutlery were, I think, generally standarddized or at least individually well sepatated. My gown, which I took along, got lost, I’m sorry to say.
   Unfortunately Uwe had to return prematurely to Germany due to a death in his family. I offered to join him, as it was already late in the term. So we came to fly by airplane from London, our first fight.
   Bradfield College gave us their coat of arms on a wooden tablet to affix on the wall. Thank you!

Googling around. More Bradfield memories at http://www.friendsreunited.co.uk/Discussion/Topic/964154.
Some (German) advertorial memories at Lobeshymnen. An Italian video from 2009.
Old Bradfieldian Society here: http://www.bradfieldcommunity.org.uk/OBSoc/Pages/default.aspx
The tie from here.

This was my Bradfield – this and much more.
Finally I’ll let you read a translation of an article I wrote for the school newspaper »Auspuff« (“exhaust pipe”). You find the German original in my blog here.
   Commenty welcome, best directly to Fritz@Joern.De

The Prefect System
by Fritz Jörn [= Joern, then 17]
Published in German in »Auspuff« of March 1959, page 10f

It’s impossible to give to the reader with just a few lines in an article a somewhat correct image of an English school, as the English school – especially the boarding school – bases on other conditions than the German school. Looking at details a foreigner might mainly know the “prefect system” and flogging.
   During my stay at Bradfield College I was assigned to just one age group, but I’ll try to show the rising from a newcomer, fag, of about thirteen to senior boy ready for university. The fag still has little amenities in this system that gives to each age group different rights and duties according to its age level. He lives in a large houseroom [there were no girls at my time] that he may use only partially; he has to sweep out, shine the prefect’s shoes and keep the rooms in order; he must ring the bell with second precision (or, if there’s no bell in the house, he has to shout a long-drawn-out “bell”), and he has to announce the time until the time to study in a sort of countdown. He’s also subordinated to the prefect, naturally. The fag sleeps in large dormitories. Like all sleeping rooms they may not be entered during the day. He keeps his books, notebooks, preserves, spirit stove, and similar private necessities in a cupboard in the house room, well stored away, as there would be no room for disorder.
   The next higher level is the senior boy. As visible sign of this he may now leave his jacket unbuttoned, and he runs around with his hands in his pockets all the time. He lives rather separated from the fags; there is always this effort to keep age groups apart. The manyfold duites of a fag mostly are dropped for him: He’s still got to serve meals and to clear table, but he gets – depending on the house’s possibilities – a sleeping room by himself or with just one other boy, and he gets a study to live. So he’s probably already out of the house room. The normal senior boy is the most comparable to a pupil at Marquartstein. He just has to wear black shoes and white collars (but not white shirts).
   The goal of a senior is to become prefect. Then he stands out from the others, he’s allowed to wear brown shoes and coloured collars, he may keep his gown over his shoulder. He gets his meals quicker, he no longer serves at the table, and he may step on certain corridors and places. He has many other rights, as most rooms are separated into normal and prefect parts. On the other side he has to watch and educate the others, practically to be seen by roll calls etc. In the higher classes (grades) probably most are prefects, but that’s difficult to say, as there are no “classes” in our sense, neither at school nor (visibly) at the boarding. The highest prefect of a house is the house prefect, the highest prefects altogether are school prefects (with white ties), from which the head boy stands out.
   I think that the prefect system not only stems from the often mentioned English character but from a practical shortage of educators. It educates the pupil to a responsible personality, shows him the power and his boundary.